Human memories are a blend of personal experiences and our knowledge of the world around us. They aren’t necessarily a record of exactly what has happened. Memories can be unreliable, new experiences mixing with the old ones. At times, faulty memories have had quite negative consequences, such as eyewitness testimony in court. Psychologists have been working to uncover what contributes to misremembering.
Decades ago, a procedure known as the DRM task was developed to study false memories. This task is a psychological experiment in which participants are given a list of words that are related to a “lure” word, which is not present. After some time passes, participants are asked to remember what words they were given. Many recall seeing the lure word even though it was absent. This effect contributes to the idea of gist memory; we store overall ideas in our minds rather than remembering on an individual basis.
Brain-imaging studies have allowed us to see where certain memories are stored. Sounds are stored in the auditory cortex, images in the visual cortex, and so on. Researchers believe that there is a certain area of our brain, known as the “hub”, which is able to see all memories at once. The hub can discern similarities among objects, even if they do not look or sound similar, such as an ostrich and hummingbird.
Researchers have theorized that our brain’s ability to see similarity in meaning causes an overlapping in patterns of brain activity. This overlapping then leads to faulty memories. No one has known exactly where this overlapping occurs until recently. Cognitive neuroscientist, Martin Chadwick, and his team used brain scanning while repeating the DRM experiment. From the scans, they were able to see that the frontal part of the brain’s anterior temporal lobe (ATL) responded in all participants during this study. Chadwick found that while such brain overlapping can lead to some unreliable memories, its organizational method allows us to remember things better.
By striving to understanding how the brain record memories, we can work to resolve legal issues associated with eyewitness testimonies. Knowledge of this can also further intelligent machine development. Our minds use memory of past experiences to adapt to new situations, allowing us to predict consequences and make appropriate decisions. Computer programs currently do only what you specifically tell them. By learning how the mind adjusts, an adaptive machine could someday be developed.
I chose this article because everyone, including me, misremembers things at times. I simply wanted to know the reason behind why that is. There may be a way to improve memory by understanding the way events are recorded. This could lead to finding a method to reduce effects caused by diseases associated with memory deterioration, such as Alzheimer’s.
The idea of intelligent machinery also intrigued me. If a machine was capable of “learning” and adapting to new situations, it could perform all sorts of tasks without needing to be specifically told to do so. However, human minds are very complex, and I am unsure of how higher thinking could be replicated by a machine.
I learned that while our minds are able to connect at a higher level, it isn’t always accurate, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. While overlapping brain patterns may result in some false memories, this process allows us to accurately retain much of our everyday experiences. The ability to make higher-level connections enables us to learn and grow. We just need to be aware of false memory, so that we are more cautious when dealing with certain situations, such as eyewitness testimony.
-Ashley B.
this is indeed very interesting. I wonder if we use these same brain parts when we dream about our experiences but small things are changed or added?
ReplyDeleteK.F.
DeleteThis article is very fascinating. I am curious as to what they can do to narrow down other possible issues with memory retention. I have seen competition in which people have train their minds to have incredible short term memory use audio clues and number sequences. Did they article mention what other options are there to test different possible reasons for memory loss? Just like the show people themselves will subconsciously have music or sound be associated with memory. Another question is if the study might discovered if there is limit to what our brains can remember? -D.D.
ReplyDeleteI found this article very interesting because there have been times that I have misremembered or things that happened a long time ago I can only remember bits and pieces. Did they mention that knowing this information could lead to helping with diseases such as Alzheimers and Dementia or is that an assumption of yours? I only ask because these two things seem very different since Alzheimers is a neurodegenerative disease.-D.B.
ReplyDeleteI have a very bad habit of splicing my memories together. I will have a memory of a story my dad telling me, but when I repeat he, he says, "no, that was like 3 stories put together"... I have also discussed with people how misrepresenting also protects us. our emotional well-being specifically, to not remember traumatic experienes or to misremember them making the damage not as significant.
ReplyDeleteA- WArdell
I once watched a video where some researchers conducted an experiment to give solid evidence of mismemory. They conducted a staged crime and pulled aside some random bystanders that had witnessed it. They asked each of these people questions about the perpetrater and the events that made up the crime. Even though they were interviewed directly after the crime many people unknowingly gave wrong information to the reporters. One lady said "He was wearing a white coat, I'm sure of it!" When indeed the robber was wearing a brown coat. It was interesting to read this article and be able to relate it to this video because if they can research further to help avoid mismemory in legal issues than many false accusations can be dismissed.
ReplyDelete-SLH
Time and time again I have learned of all the amazing abilities we as humans have and I'm always itching to understand more. I obviously knew that "Our minds use memory of past experiences to adapt to new situations, allowing us to predict consequences and make appropriate decisions." but I took a moment to really take it in that we are the only species or object on this Earth that can take advantage of this brain function. I'm eager to hear about the advances as they attempt to give computers this same ability.
ReplyDelete-SLH
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt makes me wonder if anyone was put in prison, because of a witness testifying against them saying they saw something, when in all reality it was a false statement.
ReplyDelete-Gomez
That wouldn't surprise me if it had happened unfortunately. I think that is why they rely so heavily on DNA evidence. It would be interesting if they could find a way to be able to detect this, but I doubt that it is possible at all.
DeleteMatt N.
The experiment with the "lure" word is very interesting. I've actually wondered about that before. A few years ago when I was hiking in the uintas I saw what I thought was a huge bear at the time. But it's been years and i've convinced myself that it was bigfoot :P (i'm actually not kidding). It's interesting that when the brain begins to forget details it just assumes faulty memories and theories.. Also, I feel like we are already on our way to developing machines that adapt and learn. If you look at a modern iPhone, it learns where you live without you telling it. It also knows where you're going sometimes based on repetition. For example on Tuesdays and Thursdays when I step out of my house and into my car, it tells me that traffic is light and that it will take 40 something minutes to get to UVU. That's pretty cool. I can't imagine machines and computers in the future. -Chad B
ReplyDeleteIf we really are so prone to misremember, how many of our memories really are true? Can you flip the coin and say it is less likely to actually remember something the way it is and just becuase we all do it, we think we are right? KH
ReplyDeleteI restate the question about this comment.....how many of our memories are really true? Ones that we didn't misremember or exaggerate or create. It would be amazing to figure out how to hone in on the skills necessary to help with legal stuff-eye witness accounts with crimes, or accidents.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much of what we see, our brains stores and has locked away?
ReplyDeleteI would be interested to know what all my brain has in its storage drive.
Skyler H.
There is SO much about the brain that we have yet to understand. I hope in my lifetime we will have made more leaps in its capabilities.
ReplyDeleteHW
I found this article very interesting because this idea is something i've never really thought of. I think misremembering is something most human beings do on a regular basis. This makes it interesting to study the effect of misremembering on the brain.
ReplyDelete--A.S.
Some of the research on these memories talks about pattern separation and pattern completion. They are looking at how this relates to visual as well as auditory memories, but the idea is to look at what we remember and what circumstances facilitate remembering or misremembering. This is exciting research to look at the overlapping of these memories. Trying to understand how memories are stored could be very beneficial to memory related illnesses like Alzheimers.
ReplyDeleteThis idea that we often miss read thing is fascinating. The brain is something that is a mystery to me and to know that we can often make ourselves think that we saw something that we didn't was something amazing as well. Knowing this makes me want to read more articles about the human brain.
ReplyDeleteHS